It is currently Fri Nov 28, 2014 12:03 am

All times are UTC - 4 hours [ DST ]





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: McKay, Something we don't know?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 06, 2006 4:04 pm 
Offline
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2005 3:11 pm
Posts: 4526
Location: Vancouver, WA
The Falcons remain over the cap but have yet to make any significant moves over the past few days. This despite comingdown to the wire on an extension for the past few days. Clearly McKay's position is giving him insight that other teams do not have whom have been cutting players left and right.

We haven't even tendered our RFA's yet. Despite much speculation the Falcons have been about as lively as a corpse in getting their fiscal situation squared away.

_________________
Fear the BEARD!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 06, 2006 6:05 pm 
Offline
Purveyor of Truth & Justice
Purveyor of Truth & Justice
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 3:03 pm
Posts: 26076
Location: North Carolina
Since McKay took over, the Falcons have been slow to release information such as this. On the official site, McCrary is listed as being re-signed on February 16. This info was not released to anyone outside the front office until February 28, when it first showed up in the AJC. Pro Football Weekly had the Falcons postseason roster moves on their site early in January (I had a story run based off that info on 1/10), but the official site had nothing about it until 2/1. There are numerous more examples, but more often than not, the official site will release info such as this a week or two later than it occurs. During free agency, I suspect we'll know about signings within 48 hours, but talking about tendering RFAs is not probably high on their priority list of headlining moves, since we only have 2 guys.

I'm sure the Falcons have tendered the RFAs, but it just won't be known until free agency officially starts.

_________________
"Vincere scis, Hannibal, victoria uti nescis" -- Maharbal, 216 B.C.E.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 06, 2006 9:38 pm 
Offline
Veteran
Veteran
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 10:54 pm
Posts: 107
Location: Dahlonega, GA
Pudge wrote:
Since McKay took over, the Falcons have been slow to release information such as this. On the official site, McCrary is listed as being re-signed on February 16. This info was not released to anyone outside the front office until February 28, when it first showed up in the AJC. Pro Football Weekly had the Falcons postseason roster moves on their site early in January (I had a story run based off that info on 1/10), but the official site had nothing about it until 2/1. There are numerous more examples, but more often than not, the official site will release info such as this a week or two later than it occurs. During free agency, I suspect we'll know about signings within 48 hours, but talking about tendering RFAs is not probably high on their priority list of headlining moves, since we only have 2 guys.

I'm sure the Falcons have tendered the RFAs, but it just won't be known until free agency officially starts.


You are absolutely right, Pudge. But I also think that Mckay knew something that no one else did or does. At least not in terms of the public. I think that he knew that a deal, more than likely, will get done this time. Not to mention that ESPN showed a list of teams over the cap as of today and the Falcons were not on the list. I may be wrong but all the pieces seem to fit.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 06, 2006 11:26 pm 
Offline
Playmaker
Playmaker

Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 1:51 pm
Posts: 379
Location: Estepona, Spain
Actually.. were under the cap by quite a bit..

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:15 am 
Offline
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: Thu Sep 15, 2005 10:59 am
Posts: 136
Nuccah wrote:
Actually.. were under the cap by quite a bit..


This is true...we are 2-3 million under with the restructuring of Vicks contract and releasing brady smith


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2006 1:53 pm 
Offline
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2005 3:11 pm
Posts: 4526
Location: Vancouver, WA
The Falcons are still over the cap. Pro-rating Vick's bonus saved $7.5 million and cutting Smith saved about $1.5 million. The Falcons where at least $10 million over the cap prior to these moves. We aren't much over but I believe we are still over. If Atlanta gets Dunn & Brooking to restructure we should be clear by quite a bit. I still think Weiner might be a cap-casualty or re-structures his deal.

_________________
Fear the BEARD!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2006 4:17 pm 
Offline
All-Pro
All-Pro
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 5:26 pm
Posts: 814
Cappy that's your cue!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2006 8:47 pm 
Offline
Purveyor of Truth & Justice
Purveyor of Truth & Justice
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 3:03 pm
Posts: 26076
Location: North Carolina
Dirty, I think us being $10 millino over was based on a $92 million cap. Since the cap this year will be at least $94.5 million, even the with the higest estimate I saw, the Falcons should be under the cap now.

_________________
"Vincere scis, Hannibal, victoria uti nescis" -- Maharbal, 216 B.C.E.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2006 10:19 pm 
Offline
Playmaker
Playmaker

Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 1:51 pm
Posts: 379
Location: Estepona, Spain
dirtybirdnw wrote:
The Falcons are still over the cap. Pro-rating Vick's bonus saved $7.5 million and cutting Smith saved about $1.5 million. The Falcons where at least $10 million over the cap prior to these moves. We aren't much over but I believe we are still over. If Atlanta gets Dunn & Brooking to restructure we should be clear by quite a bit. I still think Weiner might be a cap-casualty or re-structures his deal.

I'll go by the falcfans.com cap number. It said we were at 2.15 on Feb. 1st.. we made so many moves to get under I believe we may actually have around 8-9 million..

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 4 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to: