It is currently Fri May 24, 2013 9:56 pm

All times are UTC - 4 hours [ DST ]





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Whoot! We're 700,000 under the cap.
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 11:06 am 
Offline
Superstar
Superstar

Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 5:31 pm
Posts: 2805
Quote:
Earlier this week, Philadelphia Eagles cornerback Asante Samuel and Atlanta Falcons guard Justin Blalock renegotiated their contracts to facilitate a trade that sent Samuel to the cap-strapped Falcons for a 2012 seventh round pick (No. 229).

According to a league source, Samuel had his $9.9 million base salary reduced to $1.25 million, which is guaranteed for injury. Samuel also has a $2.25 million option bonus, which is to be exercised on or before May 8, 2012 and prorated over the next three seasons. Samuel also has $1 million in per game active roster bonuses ($62,500 per) next season, which if he dresses for all 16 games, would give him a 2012 cap number of $3 million.

In total, Samuel can earn $4.5 million in 2012, a reduction over the $10 million in total compensation he was due from the Eagles.

Next season, Samuel has a $3 million base salary and can earn up to $1.75 million in roster bonuses. $750,000 of that is available if Samuel is on the 53-man roster in Week 1 of the 2013 season and logged over 70 percent playing time in 2012. The remaining $1 million comes in the form of per game active roster bonuses ($62,500 per). 2014, the third season of the renegotiated contract, includes a $3.5 million base salary and $1.75 million in roster bonuses. $750,000 is available if Samuel is on the 53-man roster in Week 1 and had 70 percent playing time in 2013 with the other $1 million available in per game active roster bonuses ($62,500 per).

Samuel can earn up to $2 million in base salary escalators in 2013 and 2014, which he'd need to hit in order to earn the reported value of $18.5 million.

As for Blalock, his restructure was very straightforward. Due $2.5 million in base salary, Blalock lowered his salary to $700,000 with the remaining $1.8 million taken as a signing bonus that will be prorated over the five remaining years on his six-year, $38.4 million contract he signed in July 2011.

Blalock's restructure created $1.44 million in cap space, but Atlanta likely isn't done reworking contracts, as the two moves leave the club with around $700,000 in cap space.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Whoot! We're 700,000 under the cap.
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 3:42 pm 
Offline
Purveyor of Truth & Justice
Purveyor of Truth & Justice
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 3:03 pm
Posts: 24187
Location: North Carolina
This team's cap management this off-season has been exceptionally mediocre. A grand total of $3 million has been freed up this off-season via restructurings. On the other hand, a team like the Steelers managed to find $29 million by moving stuff around.

And someone probably says, "Pudge, the Falcons didn't have to free up a lot of money, because unlike the Steelers the Falcons were never in cap peril." And you'd be right, the Falcons didn't have to do anything. But the unfortunate thing is for the next 6 months this team is going to have to operate on the same level as the Steelers (i.e extremely frugal) because they didn't have to.

They've made their bed and now they have to lie in it. :roll:

_________________
"Vincere scis, Hannibal, victoria uti nescis" -- Maharbal, 216 B.C.E.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Whoot! We're 700,000 under the cap.
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 11:37 pm 
Offline
Superstar
Superstar

Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 11:36 pm
Posts: 1741
Hmm the way I see it, the big story here is that the team is finally spending some money instead of just keeping in Arthur's bank account like they usually do. The Salary Cap Bowl is not the competition I'm interested in seeing the Falcons win :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Whoot! We're 700,000 under the cap.
PostPosted: Tue May 01, 2012 7:29 am 
Offline
Playmaker
Playmaker

Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 1:51 pm
Posts: 348
Location: Estepona, Spain
Pudge wrote:
This team's cap management this off-season has been exceptionally mediocre. A grand total of $3 million has been freed up this off-season via restructurings. On the other hand, a team like the Steelers managed to find $29 million by moving stuff around.

And someone probably says, "Pudge, the Falcons didn't have to free up a lot of money, because unlike the Steelers the Falcons were never in cap peril." And you'd be right, the Falcons didn't have to do anything. But the unfortunate thing is for the next 6 months this team is going to have to operate on the same level as the Steelers (i.e extremely frugal) because they didn't have to.

They've made their bed and now they have to lie in it. :roll:


There is another way to look at this Pudge. The FO is looking toward the next offseason for once. They want to keep us in as good as possible a financial situation as possible next offseason, instead of restructuring the contracts of players who most likely will be cut/not resigned next year (Baker, Turner, Mughelli).

On another note, we now have about ~4m in salary cap space. We've received 3 million is credit from Vick.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Whoot! We're 700,000 under the cap.
PostPosted: Tue May 01, 2012 7:48 am 
Offline
Cap Guru
Cap Guru
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 12:28 am
Posts: 2012
Location: Macon, GA
Pudge wrote:
This team's cap management this off-season has been exceptionally mediocre. A grand total of $3 million has been freed up this off-season via restructurings. On the other hand, a team like the Steelers managed to find $29 million by moving stuff around.

And someone probably says, "Pudge, the Falcons didn't have to free up a lot of money, because unlike the Steelers the Falcons were never in cap peril." And you'd be right, the Falcons didn't have to do anything. But the unfortunate thing is for the next 6 months this team is going to have to operate on the same level as the Steelers (i.e extremely frugal) because they didn't have to.

They've made their bed and now they have to lie in it. :roll:


Eh, I don't agree with that one. All they'll really have to do is cut Ovie Mughelli or restructure his deal. Not that big of a deal really.

_________________
Follow me on Twitter @MidGaGator72


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Whoot! We're 700,000 under the cap.
PostPosted: Tue May 01, 2012 1:33 pm 
Offline
Draught Guru
Draught Guru
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 7:32 am
Posts: 4271
Okay we just got 3 million back from Vick. So, if we cut Ovie, and use that 3 million, can we take a shot at a one year contract for Osi?

Why not? Because Turner 'needs' him? :roll:

Overpriced Diva or pass rush solution?

_________________
"what if there were no hypothetical situations?"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Whoot! We're 700,000 under the cap.
PostPosted: Tue May 01, 2012 1:47 pm 
Offline
Playmaker
Playmaker
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 6:07 pm
Posts: 480
I've read a couple of places that the $3 Mil being reported that we've "received" was actually credited earlier in the year, and that the numbers we're looking at today already included said funds.

_________________
~Yulin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Whoot! We're 700,000 under the cap.
PostPosted: Tue May 01, 2012 1:51 pm 
Offline
Superstar
Superstar

Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 5:31 pm
Posts: 2805
Yulin wrote:
I've read a couple of places that the $3 Mil being reported that we've "received" was actually credited earlier in the year, and that the numbers we're looking at today already included said funds.


I've read that too.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Whoot! We're 700,000 under the cap.
PostPosted: Tue May 01, 2012 2:53 pm 
Offline
Purveyor of Truth & Justice
Purveyor of Truth & Justice
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 3:03 pm
Posts: 24187
Location: North Carolina
SteveH wrote:
Hmm the way I see it, the big story here is that the team is finally spending some money instead of just keeping in Arthur's bank account like they usually do. The Salary Cap Bowl is not the competition I'm interested in seeing the Falcons win :wink:

Not really, because when you look at which players count the most towards this year's cap, all except Grimes were signed before. Matt Ryan is the biggest hit on the cap, Blank spent his money in 2008. White (August 2009), Turner (March 2008) and Dunta (March 2010) round out the top 5. Our current inability to spend has little to do with current spending, but more of past spending.

Nuccah wrote:
There is another way to look at this Pudge. The FO is looking toward the next offseason for once. They want to keep us in as good as possible a financial situation as possible next offseason, instead of restructuring the contracts of players who most likely will be cut/not resigned next year (Baker, Turner, Mughelli).

That also isn't really the case either. Because many of the restructurings I'm talking about have minimal impact on the Falcons cap next year. For example, Michael Turner's deal is basically like a $5 million base salary + like $2 million in prorated bonus money giving him a 2012 cap hit around $7 million. If you were to reduce his base salary to near the league minimum around $800,000 and turn the difference ($4.2M) into signing bonus that would prorated over the next two years ($2.1M each), you would save about $2M against this year's cap, and only ad about $2M to next year's cap if you decide to cut him. Not a huge setback.

The same thing with Ovie in the restructuring I've outlined before: http://falcfans.com/ewings-addition-sho ... -ovie-5875

Also you look at Matt Ryan, who carries a $13 million base salary/cap hit this year with IIRC $2.75 million garuanteed. If you were to turn that into $5 million and make that fully guaranteed, and then take the $8 million difference and add it to next year's cap, that would mean he could potentially have an $18 million cap hit in 2013, the final year of his contract. But the reality is that you're not going to let that happen. You're going to re-sign him to a long-term deal before that point in time to avoid that huge cap hit. And if you were to give him the same contract that Eli Manning got from the Giants, his first year cap hit would be around $10 million, which was the amount he would have had in 2013 had you done nothing.

So you've basically saved $8 million for this year, and also signed Matt Ryan to a long-term deal with zero ramification for next year's cap. Certainly there is a ramification for 2014 and beyond, but the alternative (not having Matt Ryan as your QB) is a much higher ramification.

Those 3 moves alone would save roughly $12 million in 2012 cap space, with only about $3.5 million in penalties you would pay in 2013.

_________________
"Vincere scis, Hannibal, victoria uti nescis" -- Maharbal, 216 B.C.E.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 4 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to: