Home > Features > Preseason Game #1 Vs. New England Review

Preseason Game #1 Vs. New England Review

August 12th, 2006

After seeing it live and watching the video, preseason week 1 is in the books.

Here’s what I saw:

Offense:

Running game: Our most effective weapon and continues to be. Everyone was impressive.

Breakdown of passes:

Vick: 3/4, 26 yards, 0 TD/0 INT, 1 rush for 16 yards. Honestly, you can’t ask for anything more than what Vick did. Had it not been for a Roddy White drop he’d have been perfect on his drive.

Schaub: 7/13, 102 yards, 1 TD/1 INT, 1 rush for 7 yards. 3 bad passes, 2 drops and 1 thrown away to avoid sack. Other than the INT, which should have either been a TD or sailed out of the endzone instead of being underthrown like a wounded duck, it was a solid performance.

Randall: 5/9, 82 yards, 1 TD/0 INT, 1 rush for 29 yards. 3 bad passes, 1 drop. One of the bad passes should have been a gift INT but Randall got fortunate on that one. I would say he was as effective as Schaub and grade out as solid.

Shockley: 4/10, 40 yards, 0 TD/0 INT, 2 rushes for 12 yards. Actually played better than the numbers show. Of his 6 incompletions, 2 were due to drops, 2 were due to spikes to stop the clock and 1 was thrown away to avoid a sack which leaves just 1 overthrow.

Drops (6): Roddy White (2), Jason Randall (2), Adam Jennings (1), Kevin Youngblood (1).

Sack responsibility: First sack goes to Weiner as he was beaten by Vrabel. Second one goes to McCrary as he was eaten alive by Woods on a blitz. The last sack goes on Omiyale getting beaten by Banta-Cain.

Pass blocking: For the most part was solid. Once the younger guys came in there were some breakdowns but that’s expected.

Defense:

Run defense wasn’t good at all. Looked like a combination of 3 things. First, the o-line going through our d-line and getting to the second level, the LB’s. Guards vs. LB’s is a size disadvantage that usually gets lost. Second, LB’s not hitting the gaps and getting caught in traffic. This works hand in hand with #1. Third, poor tackling. This is amazing, as I wrote the first part of this last season and didn’t have to change a word. Hope they get this issue fixed.

The pass coverage was pretty good but definitely vanilla and not scheme specific.

D-line only got 1 sack (Abraham) and got decent pressure at times but the backups couldn’t close the deal.

Special Teams:

Outside of Cobb, I didn’t see anything impressive from out returners.

Koenen and Yelk kicked off very well with the exception of one of Yelk’s kicks which only got to the 9.

Koenen connected on all 4 of his FG’s and all were from impressive distances.

Things that really need improvement:

1. Run defense.
3. WR’s catching the ball.
4. Closing the deal tackling

Offensive MVP: Jerious Norwood
Defensive MVP: John Abraham (4 tackles, 1 sack, 1 forced fumble that led to a TD)
Special Teams MVP: Michael Koenen.

Goat of the Week: Our run defense

Camp Battle progress:

3rd QB: Both were solid and I think this battle is fairly equal. If I had to go with one right now, I’d say Randall based on experience alone.

RB: Norwood ran as well as the blocking allowed but was a very effective receiver out of the backfied. Perhaps we trade Duckett for a WR and Cobb stays as #3 as a returner?

WR: Jenkins stepped up and I also thought Youngblood did a lot of good things (especially selling out over the middle to set up the game winning field goal). Roddy White MUST develop hands. I thought Bergeron ran pretty good routes as well. This unit has a lot of work to do.

TE: Daniel Fells really impressed me with his hands. It will be interesting to see how the battle between Blakley, Beverly and Fells shakes out.

DE: Savage may have taken the lead at #4 DE but needs to work on closing the deal.

DT: Only Shropshire and Jackson stood out to me. I thought Lavalais was fairly effective in pass rushing but that’s about it.

LB: Beck and Leake really peformed well, especially on special teams.

CB: I thought Williams did well for his first game and the vanilla D. Cash also did well.

S: Not much to say yet but Turnbull probably turned some heads with his ability to hit and be around the ball.

K: If his leg can handle it all year, Koenen wins and competition is over.

Let me know your thoughts and questions otherwise:

Looking forward to next week @Green Bay next Saturday, August 19th!

Categories: Features Tags:
  1. Aaron
    August 13th, 2006 at 01:12 | #1

    If we’re going to trade Duckett, it might as well be for a DT.

  2. Anonymous
    August 13th, 2006 at 01:38 | #2

    IMO the good signs from the game:

    -Koenen, Norwood, Beck (I think he will be a starter one day), Turnbull, and Jackson. And the 3rd and 4th QB’s were decent and Jenkins didn’t drop a pass.

    The bad was the run defense and I am about sick of it. The only DT we added this off season was Jackson who was an undrafted fa. Kind of reminds me when the entire world knew we needed a back up RB for Jamal and Reeves would go out and sign Maurice Smith after the draft. Or when we would ignore the WR position because they signed that guy from Pitt (forget the name).

    Why we couldn’t have just admited our mistake and got back Jasper and Hall, I don’t know. I know those two aren’t world beaters, but it is better than what we have.

    Also, I am concerned with no one showing up ready to become a decent 3rd option at WR. I heard some Jennings hype on the net, but he did nothing to impress me.

    I hope both of these problems do not go ignored.

    I have the Panthers game on now and we need that DT because the Panthers first string offense looks damn good and Steve Smith wasn’t even there. If we don’t fix our run D, they will walk all over us on week 1.

    That’s all I have. But did anyone else notice how bad Dick Emberg was last night? Roddy Jenkins (wth)? There were so many guys names that he screwed up that I lost track of them all. Reminds me of Summeral in his latter years with his Terrance Matthews calls.

  3. Cappy
    August 13th, 2006 at 03:48 | #3

    Dick Enberg was horrible with the names that’s for sure.

    I think the biggest problem was that there just wasn’t anyone who really fit the bill when it comes to getting a DT. I really think Shropshire and Jackson may be able to be the answer we are looking for though.

  4. Anonymous
    August 13th, 2006 at 14:28 | #4

    You might be right. A lot of people wanted Grady Jackson, but I doubt he would add much at this stage of his career.

    We will see. Hopefuly Jackson and Shropshire will step it up.

  5. Oconee
    August 17th, 2006 at 03:20 | #5

    Cap, I am interested in learning more about details of some or all of the plays. I’m not an expert at NFL strategy, and would like to understand better what is really going on (or is supposed to be going on) with the plays. That would help me understand if certain players are performing as expected but don’t appear to be making the plays because of the strategy of the play. That is why I asked about the possibility of someone breaking down the plays in detail. I appreciate the effort you have already put into detailing the action.

Comments are closed.